cypress/e2e/homepage_spec/UserLogin.cy.ts (2)

1-2: Add TypeScript type annotations for better maintainability.

While the code follows POM best practices, adding type annotations would improve maintainability and IDE support.

-import LoginPage from "pageobject/Login/LoginPage";
-const loginPage = new LoginPage();
+import { LoginPage } from "pageobject/Login/LoginPage";
+const loginPage: LoginPage = new LoginPage();

---

1-45: Consider adding test cases for edge scenarios.

The test suite has good basic coverage, but consider adding these scenarios:

1. Session timeout handling
2. Network error scenarios
3. Concurrent login attempts
4. Browser refresh during login process
5. Password complexity validation

Also, consider creating custom commands for common assertions to improve code reuse.

Would you like me to help create these additional test cases or custom commands?

cypress/pageobject/Login/LoginPage.ts (4)

16-23: LGTM! Consider adding type safety for credentials.

Good implementation of parameterized login for both successful and failed scenarios. The boolean parameter effectively controls the test flow.

Consider creating an interface for credentials to make the code more maintainable:

interface LoginCredentials {
  username: string;
  password: string;
}

const VALID_CREDENTIALS: LoginCredentials = {
  username: "devdistrictadmin",
  password: "Coronasafe@123"
};

const INVALID_CREDENTIALS: LoginCredentials = {
  username: "devdistrictadmin",
  password: "Corona"
};

---

42-44: Consider adding API verification for sign out.

Good implementation using the helper function. However, consider adding API interception to verify the sign-out request completes successfully.

Add API verification similar to other methods:

interceptSignOutReq(): void {
  cy.intercept("POST", "**/api/v1/auth/logout").as("signOut");
}

verifySignOutReq(): void {
  cy.wait("@signOut").its("response.statusCode").should("eq", 200);
}

---

62-84: Consider parameterizing expected status codes.

Good implementation of API interception and verification. However, the expected status codes could be parameterized for more flexible testing.

Consider this approach:

interface ApiVerification {
  alias: string;
  expectedStatus: number;
}

verifyApiResponse({ alias, expectedStatus }: ApiVerification): void {
  cy.wait(`@${alias}`).its("response.statusCode").should("eq", expectedStatus);
}

This would allow more flexible status code verification while reducing code duplication.

---

Stability improvements need attention - hardcoded waits found

Multiple files still contain hardcoded waits that should be replaced with proper API interceptions and assertions:

• PatientLogupdate.ts: Contains 5 instances of hardcoded waits (2000-3000ms)
• PatientFileupload.ts: Contains 3 instances including a 5000ms wait
• UsersManage.cy.ts: Contains 3 instances of 5000ms waits
• PatientConsultation.ts: Contains waits of 5000ms and 3000ms
• PatientRegistration.cy.ts: Contains 6 instances of hardcoded waits

While API interceptions are well implemented in the LoginPage and other files, the presence of numerous hardcoded waits indicates that the stability improvements are incomplete. These should be replaced with proper API interceptions and assertions for better test reliability.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-84: Verify test stability improvements.

The changes align well with the PR objectives, implementing POM pattern and improving stability through API verification. Let's verify the stability improvements:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining hardcoded waits in test files
echo "Checking for hardcoded waits..."
rg "cy\.wait\(\d+" cypress/

# Check for consistent use of API interception
echo "Checking API interception usage..."
rg "cy\.intercept" cypress/

Length of output: 9813

src/components/Auth/Login.tsx (1)

Line range hint 26-427: Consider splitting the component for better maintainability.

The component currently handles both login and forgot password flows. Consider splitting it into separate components:

• LoginForm.tsx: Handle login flow
• ForgotPasswordForm.tsx: Handle password recovery flow
• AuthLayout.tsx: Handle common layout elements

This would improve:

• Code maintainability
• Component testing
• Reusability
• Separation of concerns

Additionally, consider extracting form validation logic into a custom hook for reusability.

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

cypress/pageobject/Login/LoginPage.ts (2)

16-23: Consider externalizing test credentials.

While the implementation is good, consider moving the hardcoded credentials to a configuration file or environment variables for better maintainability and security.

Example structure:

// cypress/fixtures/credentials.json
{
  "districtAdmin": {
    "username": "devdistrictadmin",
    "password": "Coronasafe@123",
    "invalidPassword": "Corona"
  }
}

---

42-60: Enable method chaining for better test flow.

Consider returning this from void methods to enable method chaining, which can make tests more readable and fluent.

Example refactor:

-  clickSignOutBtn(): void {
+  clickSignOutBtn(): this {
     cy.verifyAndClickElement("#sign-out-button", "Sign Out");
+    return this;
   }

-  fillUserNameInForgotPasswordForm(userName: string): void {
+  fillUserNameInForgotPasswordForm(userName: string): this {
     cy.get("#forgot_username").type(userName);
+    return this;
   }

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL